How long should a construction defect take to close?
As long as the due date you gave it, and not a day longer without someone hearing about it. There is no universal number: a safety item is hours, a cosmetic chip before handover is a week or two, a membrane failure waits on a trade and a drying time. What matters is that every defect carries a due date set when it is issued, that the clock is measured from when work actually started, and that the overdue ones announce themselves instead of waiting to be found. In IssuesId the due date goes on when the defect is issued, priority drives the timing, an in-progress stamp records when it was picked up, an overdue workflow rule chases it, and the Issued To report shows each trade’s open items oldest first.
The number everyone asks for is the wrong number
“How long should a defect take” gets asked as if there were an industry figure. There is not one worth having. A chipped tile in a unit that hands over in ten days has a different clock from a lifted membrane that needs the plumber back, a drying period and a re-inspection. Average the two and you have a number that is wrong for both. The useful question is narrower: did this defect have a date, was the date reasonable for what it is, and did anyone find out when it passed. A register that answers yes to all three closes defects faster than any target would, because the slow ones cannot hide in it.
Five steps, one date on every record
- 1Set the due date when you issue it, not when you notice it is lateIssuing a defect to a trade in IssuesId emails them the job: the site and the room first, then the issue and the photos, and a link that opens the work without a login. The due date goes on at the same moment, while you are standing in front of the thing. A due date added three weeks later is a guess dressed as a plan.
- 2Let priority set the clockPriority is a field on the record, and it is what the timing hangs off. The set most builders settle on is short: a safety item today, a high-priority item inside two working days, a standard item in a week or two, and an item waiting on a product or a drying time given the date the trade actually names. The point is not the numbers. It is that two people issuing defects on the same job give the same kind of item the same kind of date.
- 3Measure from pick-up, not from captureThe first time a defect leaves open, IssuesId stamps it in progress, and that stamp is never cleared or moved. So “how long did this take” has two honest answers: days since it was found, and days since someone started. The defect list filters on either, and the gap between them is where the chasing time hides.
- 4Make overdue loudAn overdue workflow rule fires when a record passes its due date without progressing: notify the trade again, tell the site manager, re-flag the item. A digest rule runs on a schedule instead and sends the outstanding list on Monday morning to whoever should be uncomfortable about it. Nobody has to remember to look.
- 5Read ageing by trade, not by scrollingThe Issued To report groups open defects by who they are issued to, in PDF or Excel, and can be scheduled to arrive on its own. Filter it to items past their fix-by date and you have the trade review in one page: who is on time, who is three weeks behind, and which items are the oldest.
Asked alongside this one
Where this answer comes from
The docs behind this answer are defects (priority, the fix-by filter and the in-progress stamp), workflow rules (the overdue trigger and digests) and reports (Issued To and scheduling). The same chasing loop applied to inspection findings is how do you track overdue inspection items across a large site?, and what the record needs to carry once the defect is closed is how do you prove a defect was fixed? For the whole lifecycle from open to verified close, read the construction defect lifecycle.